What is the Supreme Court said to the Babri Masjid!

Senior advocate Rajiv Dhawan, appearing for the Babri Masjid, during the hearing in the Supreme Court Ayodhya case, is demanding the re-idea of the Ismail Farooqi verdict of 1994. He said that in this judgment the mosque was not considered an essential part of Islam. Rajiv Dhawan said that according to Islam the mosque is of great importance, if once the mosque becomes, then it is considered to be the property of Allah,

It can not be broken The advocate of the Babri parties said that Mohammed himself had created the mosque 30 km away from Medina. It is considered mandatory for its followers to have a mosque in Islam.

Rajiv Dhawan said in the Supreme Court that saying that there was no mosque in this place (on Ayodhya’s disputed structure), nothing happens with it. Who ordered this that there would be no prayer at the place. Today’s hearings have been completed in the Supreme Court on this matter. Now the next hearing of the case will be on April 6.

Let us tell you that on March 16, Waseem Rizvi, Shia Waqf Board, gave a big statement about the places of controversy. He suggested the Muslim Personal Law Board to stop prayers at disputed places. In these places, he also included the mosque built in Ayodhya. He also said that the disputed site of Ayodhya should be handed over to the Hindus as the mosque was demolished and the mosque was demolished.

Significantly, Rizvi had earlier advocated for the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya several times before. However, for this, he had to face criticism from the Muslim Personal Law Board.

Report of Amit Singh Negi for Idea for News from Delhi / Dehradun /